Social Movements of the Global South – Methodological and Theoretical Considerations

Social Movements of the Global South – Methodological and Theoretical Considerations

Veranstalter
ISA47 journal "Social Movements and Change (SM&C)"
Veranstaltungsort
Ort
-
Land
South Africa
Vom - Bis
15.12.2015 -
Deadline
15.12.2015
Website
Von
Philipp Altmann

CALL FOR PAPERS ISA47 JOURNAL

ISA47 is launching a new journal Social Movements and Change (SM&C). Philipp Altmann, Deniz Günce Demirhisar and Jacob Mwathi Mati are organizing a special edition on "Social Movements of the Global South – Methodological and Theoretical Considerations". Their aim is to "bring together research on social movements worldwide that break with the Eurocentric bias of social movement theory and try to develop both theories and methodologies apt to understand action, discourse or outcomes of social movements in the Global South". Please circulate widely in your networks and among your students, as there will also be a PhD section.

SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND CHANGE (SM&C)

Call for papers for the first special edition

Social Movements and Change is a new journal edited by the ISA 47th Research Committee (Social Classes and Social Movements). The intellectual stance of Social Movements and Change can be captured in the themes and issues that have been faced and investigated by the Research Committee 47 of International Sociological Association (ISA). SM&C will focus on socio-cultural and transnational practices, with particular attention paid to the relationship between social actors and society, both at global and local level.

Social Movements of the Global South. Methodological and Theoretical Considerations

Editors: Philipp Altmann, Deniz Günce Demirhisar, Jacob Mwathi Mati

It is a common place among social movement researchers that the major part of social movement theory was built on the model of experiences of the Global North and therefore in tendency Eurocentric. While investigation on social movements in the Global South has been increasing in the last few decades, most of those studies stick to the major theories made in the Global North, in some cases, reducing the scope of them. The theoretical and –as a necessary next step- methodological bias does therefore actively harm research in the major part of the world, turning it in the best case into an application of foreign thought. At the same time, there are some social movement theories that actually were developed from the experiences of the Global South, opening new ways to understand the action of social movements both there and in the Global North. Nevertheless, concepts developed from the experience of social movements of the Global South, such as the approach of “cultural politics” of Sonia Álvarez, Evelina Dagnino and Arturo Escobar (1998), or the introduction of the factor distance by Diane Davis (1999), are not sufficiently integrated into social movement studies. Instead, they have been relegated to approaches identified with cultural studies (and not sociology and political studies) or simply ignored.

Moreover, Global South and Global North do not necessarily refer to a rigid dichotomy between geographic areas and historically established power structures. These expressions could be also understood as intermediate conceptual tools in order to investigate what is really global in the recent waves of protest and indignation all over the world, especially since 2011.

Beyond comparisons or correlations, the concept of resonance (Khasnabish 2007; Pleyers and Glasuis 2013) has a great heuristic value for the actual global configuration of social movements. For instance, what motivates a young activist of Gezi Movement while referring to the Zapatistas, Indignados, Occupy Wall Street or Tahrir Square? How do the social actors invent their activism practices by combining the peculiarities of their very local context and the transnational common struggles i.e. against the global finance capitalism as well as ecological destruction? What are the emotions and subjectivities that are transversal to the social movements of our era? To what extent, do the reticular forms of power result in networks of outrage and hope (Castells 2012)?

This thematic edition aims to bring together research on social movements worldwide that break with the Eurocentric bias of social movement theory and try to develop both theories and methodologies apt to understand action, discourse or outcomes of social movements in the Global South. In this attempt could enter the question to what extent the Eurocentric bias has reduced the scope of research on social movements of the Global South and new experiences in the Global North, how this effect did influence prior research and which alternatives have been undertaken. The main focus should be the development of alternative theories and/or methodologies that reflect the experiences of the Global South and the new ones in the Global North in a better way. In order to engage in this academic work from a legitimized and credible standpoint, it is necessary to integrate researchers from all parts of the world that research social movements in the Global South, putting special emphasis on a considerable representation of Africa, Latin America and Asia.

Literature
Alvarez, Sonia/Dagnino, Evelina/Escobar, Arturo (1998) (eds.): Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures. Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements, Boulder: Westview Press.
Castells, Manuel (2012): Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age, Cambridge: Polity Press
Davis, Diane (1999): The Power of Distance: Re-Theorizing Social Movements in Latin America, Theory and Society 28 (5): 585-638.
Khasnabish, Alex (2007): Insurgent imaginations in Ephemera 7 (4): 505-525
Pleyers, Geoffrey / Glasius, Marlies (2013): La résonance des « mouvements des places » connexions, émotions, valeurs in Socio 1 (2): 59-79.

Programm

Kontakt