Sessions
1. Violence as category: opening the debate
The first panel will begin with three or four very different examples of how ‘violence’ is distinguished from ‘non-violent’, in a bid to open up our discussion and start tracing connections across a wide range of contexts. For example, how does ‘violence’ get defined in scientific and/or non-scientific scholarship, and to what effect? Why are legislators and lawyers reluctant to use violence as a concept while policy uses it frequently? And in what ways and to what ends does ‘violence’ get represented in art or in ritual?
2. ‘Violence’ as limit to legality, civility and normality
Violence has long been used to mark off other categories such as civility, legality and normality. ‘Violence’ began to be constituted in 17th century Europe as a threat to the state and its ‘civil society’, and in the present day organizations and movements are often assessed in terms of their propensity for ‘violence’, while scholars look for ‘violent’ pathogens (literally or metaphorically) in individuals. We are looking for speakers to offer two different examples in order to open up our discussion of how ‘violence’ is used to police the boundary of the legal, the civil and the normal.
3. Kindred categories: sex and violence, religion and violence, power and violence
Why and to what effect does violence get linked to other categories such as religion, sex and power, which get blamed for being sources of violence? How has the history of such categories become intertwined in notions of ‘religious violence’ or ‘sexual violence’, for example?
4. When the boundaries of ‘violence’ get disputed
How, why and with what consequences do we dispute the boundaries of violence, for example by labeling as ‘symbolic violence’ actions that are not normally described as violent? What happens, for example, when scholars argue that policy-makers ‘do violence’ by describing Afghan women as oppressed? Or when analysts describe as ‘state violence’ actions – such as policing or war – that are not normally characterized as such?
5. Violence as category, as disruption: a final reflection
The final panel will pose a series of questions that invite us to reflect on our attempts during the workshop to focus on violence as a category rather than as a phenomenon. Given that violence is considered something that somehow defies or disrupts categorization, what are the consequences of trying to focus on violence as category? What kind of category is violence, and how does that affect the way it works?